Introduced
by
To increase the registration and license fees pesticide applicators contained in the state pesticide regulation law, revise and update the registration and licensure provisions of the law, provide new and updated definitions, and increased felony penalties for certain violations.
Referred to the Committee on Farming, Agribusiness, and Food Systems
Substitute offered
To add a provision making the deliberate misuse of a pesticide a felony.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 36 to 0 (details)
To revise and update the registration and licensure provisions in the state pesticide regulation law, increase license fees, provide new and updated definitions, and increased felony penalties for certain violations.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with a version recommended by the committee which reported it. The substitute incorporates technical changes resulting from committee testimony and deliberation. These changes do not affect the substance of the bill as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To reduce the proposed license fee increase for a private agriculture applicator's license.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To reduce the proposed license fee increase for a private applicator's license.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To replace references to “microbiocide” pesticides with “antimicrobial pesticide,” and insert a reference to federal regulation of these substances in the definition.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To authorize the Department of Agriculture to make administrative rulings that would force a company which it determined had improperly applied pesticide to pay the property owner the costs of a department-approved cleanup.
The amendment failed 43 to 49 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To authorize the Department of Agriculture to make administrative rulings that would force a company which it determined had improperly applied pesticide to pay the property owner the costs of a cleanup approved by either the Department of Natural Resources or the Department of Environmental Quality.
The amendment failed 43 to 50 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To authorize the Department of Agriculture to revoke the license of a company which it determined had improperly applied pesticide on a person's property and not cleaned it up within 30 days.
The amendment failed 42 to 58 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To reduce the proposed license fee increases for different kinds of pesicide applicators' licenses.
The amendment passed 56 to 41 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To reconsider the vote by which the House adopted the amendment to reduce the proposed license fee increases for different kinds of pesicide applicators' licenses.
The amendment passed 58 to 40 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To withdraw the amendment to reduce the proposed license fee increases for different kinds of pesicide applicators' licenses. This action took place immediately before Rep. Woodward's amendment was adopted in a voice vote to establish in statute that a civil cause of action arises if a licensed pesticide applicator is negligent in applying, storing or handling pesticides, rather than requiring gross negligence as in current law.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To establish in statute that a civil cause of action arises if a licensed pesticide applicator is negligent in applying, storing or handling pesticides, rather than requiring gross negligence as in current law.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 95 to 4 (details)
To revise and update the registration and licensure provisions in the state pesticide regulation law, increase license fees, provide new and updated definitions, and increased felony penalties for certain violations.
Amendment offered
by
To remove certain felony provisions in the bill, which already exist in the state criminal code, and reverse a House amendment which would establish in statute that a civil cause of action arises if a licensed pesticide applicator is negligent in applying, storing or handling pesticides, rather than requiring gross negligence as in current law.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 22 to 12 (details)
To concur with the House-passed version of the bill.
Passed in the House 65 to 41 (details)
To concur with the Senate-passed version of the bill.
