Introduced
by
The executive recommendation for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2005-2006 Judiciary budget. This appropriates $257.7 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including special state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), compared to $253.2 million, which was the FY 2004-2005 amount enrolled in 2004. Of this, $159.9 million will come from the general fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the FY 2004-2005 amount of $158.0 million. Much more information on Michigan’s budget is available at <a href="http://www.mackinac.org/article.asp?ID=4964">Hot Topics: Michigan’s Budget Challenge</a> at www.mackinac.org/4964.
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (S-2) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To replace the executive proposal for this budget with one that expresses policy differences between the Republican-majority in the Senate and Governor Jennifer Granholm on certain spending items and funding sources. For much more detail see <a href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2005-2006/billanalysis/senate/pdf/2005-SFA-0275-F.pdf">analysis</a> from the non-partisan Senate Fiscal Agency”>analysis</a> from the non-partisan Senate Fiscal Agency.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 37 to 0 (details)
The senate version of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2005-2006 Judiciary budget. This appropriates $250.9 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including special state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), compared to $253.2 million, which was the FY 2004-2005 amount enrolled in 2004. Of this, $155.8 million will come from the general fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the FY 2004-2005 amount of $158.0 million.
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations
Reported without amendment
Substitute offered
To replace the Senate-passed version of this budget with one that “strips” all actual appropriations. See House-passed version for explanation.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 102 to 0 (details)
To send the bill back to the Senate "stripped" of all actual appropriations, leaving it in its orginal form as a "template" or "placeholder." This vote is basically a procedural method of launching negotiations to work out the differences between the House and Senate budgets.
Failed in the Senate 0 to 35 (details)
To concur with a House-passed version of the bill. The vote sends the bill to a House-Senate conference committee to work out the differences.
Received
Passed in the Senate 36 to 1 (details)
The House-Senate conference report for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2005-2006 Judiciary budget. This appropriates $252.8 million in adjusted gross spending, compared to $253.2 million, which was the FY 2004-2005 amount enrolled in 2004. Of this, $157.6 million will come from the general fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the FY 2004-2005 amount of $158.0 million.
Passed in the House 106 to 0 (details)
