Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2008 House Bill 6088 (Require licensure of home inspectors )

[Comments on this legislation] [Text and Analysis] [Add to Watch List]
[Previous] [Next]

Most Recent Comments

1) very unrealistic [by Anonymous Citizen on September 4, 2008]
The liability issue is one thing but what about the licensing requirement of participating in 200 inspections under another inspector? I am currently enrolled in a home inspection program and was hoping to start a good honest business to support myself and family. What the hell is someone going to say when a 40 year old guy walks in to a home inspection company and says hey I wonder if I could have 200 of your jobs? Thanks a lot Michigan you did it again!
Reply

Line

2) Stop whining [by Anonymous Citizen on August 18, 2008]
From first hand experience... Had our new home inspected (Large Michigan HI CO.), after the inspection we closed on the house. A month later when the weather started getting warm, house started smelling like a camp fire. Well, our wonderful "professional" that inspected our home "missed" all the fire damage in the attic. Which he inspected and commented was in good condition. Whoops! Seller didn't disclose so obviously they are responsible as well, but what's the point of having a home inspection if this kind of negligence exsists. But I had to sign the CYA contract that Michigan home inspector require you to sign. I believe this legislation is targeting these types of "inspectors". "Assistant fry guy at the burger joint this week-Michigan home inspector next week". About time some accountability will be forced upon the housing industry in our state!
Reply

Line

3) Great Idea [by Anonymous Citizen on August 13, 2008]
It's about time we stopped the evil home inspectors from wreaking havoc on our wonderful state. More Regulation Now!
Reply

Line


View Full Conversation