Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2012 House Bill 5261: Allow more school retiree “double dipping”

Public Act 464 of 2012

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Comments

1) Re: 2012 House Bill 5261 (Allow more school retiree “double dipping” )  by morran612 on January 25, 2013 
I actually agree with this one, some people can work longer years than other, why not give them this chance? My old marketing degree was extraordinary, I had so much to learn from that man, it would have been such a loss for all of us if he would stop teaching after retiring.

Line

2) Re: 2012 House Bill 5261 (Allow more school retiree “double dipping” )  by TALKER61 on December 3, 2012 

 THIS IS NOT A SMART BILL. ALL THIS DOES IS MAKE IT MORE DIFFCULTY FOR THE YOUNGER, UST OUT OF COLLEGE PERSON TO FIND A DECEIT PAYING JOB.


NO DOUBLE DIPPING SHOULD BE ALLOWED.IF THAT RETIREE WANTED TO CONTINUE TO WORK IN HIS/HER FIELD THEY SHOULD HAVE NEVER RETIRED. WE RETIREES NEED TO MOVE OUT OF THE WAY AND LET THE YOUNGER GENERATION BE ABLE TO MAKE A DECEIT LIVING FOR HIS OR HER FAMILY.


OUR SOCIETY IS ALWAYS TALKING ABOUT THE YOUNG PEOPLE NOT WORKING A BEING PRODUCTIVE.THEY WOULD LOVE TO FOR EXCEPT THE OLD WORKERS ARE RETIRING AND GOING BACK TO THE SAME PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT.I WONDER DO THOSE IDIOTS IN LANSING EVER THINK BEFORE THEY SPONSOR SOME OF TESE STUPID BILLS.THEY ARE TOO SELF RIGHTEOUS.


Line

3) 2012 House Bill 5261 (Allow more school retiree “double dipping” )  by admin on December 3, 2012 
Introduced in the House on January 19, 2012, to allow a former school employee to work as a substitute teacher or coach in the district he or she "retired" from and still collect a pension in addition to the substitute or coaching pay. This would also apply if the "retiree" was employed by private firm under contract to provide substitute teachers

The vote was 105 in favor, 1 opposed and 4 not voting

(House Roll Call 659 at House Journal 0)

Click here to view bill details.

Line

View pre-2013 Comments.
Your new comments should be made in the box below.