Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2011 Senate Bill 370: Increase future unemployment benefits (Senate Roll Call 90)
facebook  twitter 

Motion by Sen. Virgil Smith, Jr. (D) on February 22, 2012, to discharge the bill from committee and bring it directly to the Senate floor for a vote. The motion failed 12 to 24 in the Senate on February 22, 2012.
View All of Senate Bill 370: History, Amendments & Comments 

The vote was 12 in favor, 24 against, and 2 not voting.
(Senate Roll Call 90)

Print-friendly version

 Comment on this vote   View others' comments   Add to scorecard 


In Favor In Favor
Against Against
Not Voting Not Voting
12 total votes
26 total votes
3 total votes

What do you think? In Favor Against Undecided (log on required)


The motion



Anderson (D)Bieda (D)Gleason (D)Gregory (D)Hood (D)
Hopgood (D)Hunter (D)Smith (D)Warren (D)Whitmer (D)
Young (D)    


Rocca (R)




Booher (R)Brandenburg (R)Casperson (R)Caswell (R)Colbeck (R)
Emmons (R)Green (R)Hansen (R)Hildenbrand (R)Hune (R)
Jansen (R)Jones (R)Kahn (R)Kowall (R)Marleau (R)
Meekhof (R)Moolenaar (R)Pappageorge (R)Pavlov (R)Proos (R)
Richardville (R)Robertson (R)Schuitmaker (R)Walker (R) 


Johnson (D)Nofs (R)


Y    Anderson (D)Y    Bieda (D)  n  Booher (R)  n  Brandenburg (R)  n  Casperson (R)
  n  Caswell (R)  n  Colbeck (R)  n  Emmons (R)Y    Gleason (D)  n  Green (R)
Y    Gregory (D)  n  Hansen (R)  n  Hildenbrand (R)Y    Hood (D)Y    Hopgood (D)
  n  Hune (R)Y    Hunter (D)  n  Jansen (R)  -  Johnson (D)  n  Jones (R)
  n  Kahn (R)  n  Kowall (R)  n  Marleau (R)  n  Meekhof (R)  n  Moolenaar (R)
  -  Nofs (R)  n  Pappageorge (R)  n  Pavlov (R)  n  Proos (R)  n  Richardville (R)
  n  Robertson (R)Y    Rocca (R)  n  Schuitmaker (R)Y    Smith (D)  n  Walker (R)
Y    Warren (D)Y    Whitmer (D)Y    Young (D)  

Senate Roll Call 90 on The motion



Re: 2011 Senate Bill 370 (Increase future unemployment benefits )  by TaterSalad on February 25, 2012 


There is no question that extending unemployment benefits for such a long time period increases unemployment. Unemployed workers searching for work often refuse offers, hoping to get better offers in the future. Unemployment insurance makes such refusals happen much more.

On the other hand, for many workers, long-term structural unemployment requires them to acquire new skills, and that can take time… But no matter what people decide to do vis-a-vis re-training, unemployment insurance should not be provided indefinitely. Two years of unemployment insurance, even for those seeking re-training, is too much.

Re: 2011 Senate Bill 370 (Increase future unemployment benefits )  by jons on February 25, 2012 

 To answer your question, I am working and never have drawn unemployment. When I first got married, 23 years ago, I worked for $50 dollars a week while I was starting my own business. I also had a night job. No unemployment there.  As a tax payer, and a business owner, this subject totally effects me. Michigan citizens are the ones paying for these unemployment extensions. All that money has to come from somewhere. As a business owner, this totally effects me too.  I am always looking for quality employees and sometimes they are hard to find when I am competing with the government who is paying people to stay home. And yes, Michigan was in a single state recession for 10 years, thanks to liberal policies which were anti business and caused high taxes,  and entrenched unions. Not many business would want to move to Michigan and pay higher taxes and have to fight unions constantly. Business are leaving California and Illinois in droves, and they should be coming here. Instead, they are going to states like Texas, Tennessee, Colorado and 22 other Right To Work states, but that is another whole topic. Anyway, Sweetflower, we will probably have to agree to disagree. I do feel for the unemployed, as a business owner, I am always just a few decisions from being one myself, but there has to be a limit on how long and how much someone can draw. Otherwise it bloats our state budget, which bloats our taxes which, in turn, deters businesses from staying or coming to Michigan to create jobs and the cycle continues.

Re: 2011 Senate Bill 370 (Increase future unemployment benefits )  by sweetflower on February 24, 2012 

You did not answer my question,  you must be working and it  sounds like never drawn unemployment before.  You are talking about a subject that apparently does not effect you.  You have to be in people's shoes before you know what it is like to have to ask for help.  Unemployment is paid for by the employers little by little for bad economic times like now.  How long people draw is determined by the recession we are in and the percentage of people not able to find work.  This recession and housing meltdown made it worse and longer.  I am sure you apparently watch the news for  your info,  so you have to know how bad it was.  And Michigan was especially hard hit and had been for 10 years,  way before the other states felt it.  Manufacturing going overseas helped Michigan to go down.  Your frriend may have gotten himself going but all people are different.  Some don't even have a garage to start a business in.  You are talking about someone else,  not yourself.  As I said you are working and have no clue what is going on with people.  If you aren't in their shoes or been there,  I see why you think its a give away program.  Most people spouting out that way are the same.  People need help and the ability to get thru until things greatly improve and businesses actually do some hiring.  Trickle down for the last 12  years of the Bush tax cuts did not trickle down.  Never does.  If you don't believe me,  google it.  Lots of articles on it.  Good luck and please don't think  everyone is sitting home doing nothing.  It is not true.  Things are improving but a long way to go.................


View More pre-2013 Comments.
Your new comments should be made in the box below.