Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2012 Senate Bill 971: Limit unionization of grad student research assistants (House Roll Call 86)
facebook  twitter 

Passed 62 to 45 in the House on March 1, 2012, to establish that state university graduate students who work as research assistants are not considered government employees for purposes of enrolling them into a union, if their work terms do not meet an IRS "20 factor test" for employee status. This relates to a Mackinac Center lawsuit filed on behalf of graduate student research assistants (GSRAs) at the University of Michigan. See also House Bill 4003, which would more broadly prohibit “stealth unionizations,” including an ongoing one involving home heath care aides and the SEIU union.
View All of Senate Bill 971: History, Amendments & Comments 

The vote was 62 in favor, 45 against, and 1 not voting.
(House Roll Call 86)

Print-friendly version

 Comment on this vote   View others' comments   Add to scorecard 

Line

Vote
In Favor In Favor
Against Against
Not Voting Not Voting
 Undecided
Republican
100100%
1000%
1000%
62 total votes
Democrat
1000%
97397%
2982%
46 total votes
Voters
1000%
100100%
1000%
1 total vote

What do you think? In Favor Against Undecided (log on required)

Line

Limit unionization of grad student research assistants

IN FAVOR

HOUSE DEMOCRATS
none

HOUSE REPUBLICANS

Agema (R)Bolger (R)Bumstead (R)Callton (R)Cotter (R)
Crawford (R)Daley (R)Damrow (R)Denby (R)Farrington (R)
Forlini (R)Foster (R)Franz (R)Genetski (R)Gilbert (R)
Glardon (R)Goike (R)Haines (R)Haveman (R)Heise (R)
Hooker (R)Horn (R)Hughes (R)Huuki (R)Jacobsen (R)
Jenkins (R)Johnson (R)Knollenberg (R)Kowall (R)Kurtz (R)
LaFontaine (R)Lori (R)Lund (R)Lyons (R)MacGregor (R)
MacMaster (R)McBroom (R)McMillin (R)Moss (R)Muxlow (R)
Nesbitt (R)O'Brien (R)Olson (R)Opsommer (R)Ouimet (R)
Outman (R)Pettalia (R)Poleski (R)Potvin (R)Price (R)
Pscholka (R)Rendon (R)Rogers (R)Schmidt, W. (R)Shaughnessy (R)
Shirkey (R)Somerville (R)Stamas (R)Tyler (R)Walsh (R)
Yonker (R)Zorn (R)   


AGAINST

HOUSE DEMOCRATS

Ananich (D)Barnett (D)Bauer (D)Bledsoe (D)Brown (D)
Brunner (D)Byrum (D)Cavanagh (D)Clemente (D)Constan (D)
Darany (D)Dillon (D)Durhal (D)Geiss (D)Hammel (D)
Hobbs (D)Hovey-Wright (D)Howze (D)Irwin (D)Jackson (D)
Kandrevas (D)Lane (D)LeBlanc (D)Lindberg (D)Lipton (D)
Liss (D)McCann (D)Meadows (D)Nathan (D)Oakes (D)
Olumba (D)Rutledge (D)Santana (D)Schmidt, R. (D)Segal (D)
Slavens (D)Smiley (D)Stallworth (D)Stanley (D)Stapleton (D)
Switalski (D)Talabi (D)Tlaib (D)Townsend (D)Womack (D)

HOUSE REPUBLICANS
none


HOUSE LEGISLATORS WHO DID NOT VOTE

Haugh (D)



HOUSE LEGISLATORS ALL VOTES

Y    Agema (R)  n  Ananich (D)  n  Barnett (D)  n  Bauer (D)  n  Bledsoe (D)
Y    Bolger (R)  n  Brown (D)  n  Brunner (D)Y    Bumstead (R)  n  Byrum (D)
Y    Callton (R)  n  Cavanagh (D)  n  Clemente (D)  n  Constan (D)Y    Cotter (R)
Y    Crawford (R)Y    Daley (R)Y    Damrow (R)  n  Darany (D)Y    Denby (R)
  n  Dillon (D)  n  Durhal (D)Y    Farrington (R)Y    Forlini (R)Y    Foster (R)
Y    Franz (R)  n  Geiss (D)Y    Genetski (R)Y    Gilbert (R)Y    Glardon (R)
Y    Goike (R)Y    Haines (R)  n  Hammel (D)  -  Haugh (D)Y    Haveman (R)
Y    Heise (R)  n  Hobbs (D)Y    Hooker (R)Y    Horn (R)  n  Hovey-Wright (D)
  n  Howze (D)Y    Hughes (R)Y    Huuki (R)  n  Irwin (D)  n  Jackson (D)
Y    Jacobsen (R)Y    Jenkins (R)Y    Johnson (R)  n  Kandrevas (D)Y    Knollenberg (R)
Y    Kowall (R)Y    Kurtz (R)Y    LaFontaine (R)  n  Lane (D)  n  LeBlanc (D)
  n  Lindberg (D)  n  Lipton (D)  n  Liss (D)Y    Lori (R)Y    Lund (R)
Y    Lyons (R)Y    MacGregor (R)Y    MacMaster (R)Y    McBroom (R)  n  McCann (D)
Y    McMillin (R)  n  Meadows (D)Y    Moss (R)Y    Muxlow (R)  n  Nathan (D)
Y    Nesbitt (R)Y    O'Brien (R)  n  Oakes (D)Y    Olson (R)  n  Olumba (D)
Y    Opsommer (R)Y    Ouimet (R)Y    Outman (R)Y    Pettalia (R)Y    Poleski (R)
Y    Potvin (R)Y    Price (R)Y    Pscholka (R)Y    Rendon (R)Y    Rogers (R)
  n  Rutledge (D)  n  Santana (D)  n  Schmidt, R. (D)Y    Schmidt, W. (R)  n  Segal (D)
Y    Shaughnessy (R)Y    Shirkey (R)  n  Slavens (D)  n  Smiley (D)Y    Somerville (R)
  n  Stallworth (D)Y    Stamas (R)  n  Stanley (D)  n  Stapleton (D)  n  Switalski (D)
  n  Talabi (D)  n  Tlaib (D)  n  Townsend (D)Y    Tyler (R)Y    Walsh (R)
  n  Womack (D)Y    Yonker (R)Y    Zorn (R)  

House Roll Call 86 on 2012 Senate Bill 971

Line

Comments

Re: 2012 Senate Bill 971 (Ban “stealth unionization” of graduate student research assistants )  by bethmich on February 27, 2013 
Participating in this Oracle Boot Camp, one gets a detailed official curriculum to study from. The experienced and certified Oracle trainers take you through a number of practice tests to thoroughly prepare you for the certification exam.

Re: 2012 Senate Bill 971 (Ban “stealth unionization” of graduate student research assistants )  by perrys on July 30, 2012 
I see the full meaning of that but let's not forget that these students are those in need of support so it's important that they should be labeled on the side that gives them the most financial advantages. I am actually getting ready to start a new degree online program, I am hopeful that these bills will work in favor of the students.


Re: 2012 Senate Bill 971 (Ban “stealth unionization” of graduate student research assistants )  by Admin003 on February 22, 2012 

Senator Richardville asked and was granted unanimous consent to make a statement and moved that the statement be
printed in the Journal.
The motion prevailed.
Senator Richardville’s statement is as follows:
I rise to talk about Senate Bill No. 971 for a moment. Senate Bill No. 971 clarifies that graduate student research
assistants are not employees under the Public Employment Relations Act. This bill will codify, actually, a thirty­year­old ruling
in a long­standing interpretation by the Michigan Employment Relations Commission
According to the Michigan Constitution, the Legislature may enact laws provide for the resolution of disputes concerning
public employees, except those in state classified civil services. So all we are doing is codifying something that has been
a longstanding tradition and interpretation, as I said, for over thirty years.
What this bill does is seek to uphold the faculty­student relationship indicating that these students are students—seems
like common sense would probably understand and dictate that—but the faculty serve as mentors to these students as they
pursue advanced degrees. That is all we are doing, saying, gee, students are students, just like they have been for over
thirty years

View These pre-2013 Comments on the Forum.
Your new comments should be made in the box below.