Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2011 House Bill 4003: "Right-to-work" for government, school employees (as enacted; originally something else) (House Roll Call 721)
facebook  twitter 

Passed 58 to 51 in the House on December 11, 2012, to prohibit Michigan governments and schools from enforcing a union contract provision that compels employees to join or financially support a union as a condition of employment, except for police and firefighters, who could still be dismissed for failing to pay union dues or fees. All Democrats voted "no" and all Republicans voted "yes" except for Reps. Forlini, Goike, Horn, McBroom, Somerville and Zorn.
View All of House Bill 4003: History, Amendments & Comments 

The vote was 58 in favor, 51 against, and 1 not voting.
(House Roll Call 721)

Print-friendly version

 Comment on this vote   View others' comments   Add to scorecard 

Line

Vote
In Favor In Favor
Against Against
Not Voting Not Voting
 Undecided
Republican
901090%
9919%
1000%
64 total votes
Democrat
1000%
97397%
2982%
46 total votes

What do you think? In Favor Against Undecided (log on required)

Line

"Right-to-work" for government, school employees (as enacted; originally something else)

IN FAVOR

HOUSE DEMOCRATS
none

HOUSE REPUBLICANS

Agema (R)Bolger (R)Bumstead (R)Callton (R)Cotter (R)
Crawford (R)Daley (R)Damrow (R)Denby (R)Farrington (R)
Foster (R)Franz (R)Genetski (R)Gilbert (R)Glardon (R)
Graves (R)Haines (R)Haveman (R)Heise (R)Hooker (R)
Hughes (R)Huuki (R)Jacobsen (R)Jenkins (R)Johnson (R)
Knollenberg (R)Kowall (R)Kurtz (R)LaFontaine (R)Lori (R)
Lund (R)Lyons (R)MacGregor (R)MacMaster (R)McMillin (R)
Moss (R)Muxlow (R)Nesbitt (R)O'Brien (R)Olson (R)
Opsommer (R)Ouimet (R)Outman (R)Pettalia (R)Poleski (R)
Potvin (R)Price (R)Pscholka (R)Rendon (R)Rogers (R)
Schmidt, R. (R)Schmidt, W. (R)Shaughnessy (R)Shirkey (R)Stamas (R)
Tyler (R)Walsh (R)Yonker (R)  


AGAINST

HOUSE DEMOCRATS

Ananich (D)Barnett (D)Bauer (D)Bledsoe (D)Brown (D)
Brunner (D)Byrum (D)Cavanagh (D)Clemente (D)Constan (D)
Darany (D)Dillon (D)Durhal (D)Geiss (D)Greimel (D)
Hammel (D)Haugh (D)Hobbs (D)Hovey-Wright (D)Howze (D)
Irwin (D)Jackson (D)Kandrevas (D)Lane (D)LeBlanc (D)
Lindberg (D)Lipton (D)Liss (D)McCann (D)Meadows (D)
Nathan (D)Oakes (D)Olumba (D)Rutledge (D)Santana (D)
Segal (D)Slavens (D)Smiley (D)Stallworth (D)Stanley (D)
Stapleton (D)Switalski (D)Talabi (D)Tlaib (D)Townsend (D)

HOUSE REPUBLICANS

Forlini (R)Goike (R)Horn (R)McBroom (R)Somerville (R)
Zorn (R)    


HOUSE LEGISLATORS WHO DID NOT VOTE

Womack (D)



HOUSE LEGISLATORS ALL VOTES

Y    Agema (R)  n  Ananich (D)  n  Barnett (D)  n  Bauer (D)  n  Bledsoe (D)
Y    Bolger (R)  n  Brown (D)  n  Brunner (D)Y    Bumstead (R)  n  Byrum (D)
Y    Callton (R)  n  Cavanagh (D)  n  Clemente (D)  n  Constan (D)Y    Cotter (R)
Y    Crawford (R)Y    Daley (R)Y    Damrow (R)  n  Darany (D)Y    Denby (R)
  n  Dillon (D)  n  Durhal (D)Y    Farrington (R)  n  Forlini (R)Y    Foster (R)
Y    Franz (R)  n  Geiss (D)Y    Genetski (R)Y    Gilbert (R)Y    Glardon (R)
  n  Goike (R)Y    Graves (R)  n  Greimel (D)Y    Haines (R)  n  Hammel (D)
  n  Haugh (D)Y    Haveman (R)Y    Heise (R)  n  Hobbs (D)Y    Hooker (R)
  n  Horn (R)  n  Hovey-Wright (D)  n  Howze (D)Y    Hughes (R)Y    Huuki (R)
  n  Irwin (D)  n  Jackson (D)Y    Jacobsen (R)Y    Jenkins (R)Y    Johnson (R)
  n  Kandrevas (D)Y    Knollenberg (R)Y    Kowall (R)Y    Kurtz (R)Y    LaFontaine (R)
  n  Lane (D)  n  LeBlanc (D)  n  Lindberg (D)  n  Lipton (D)  n  Liss (D)
Y    Lori (R)Y    Lund (R)Y    Lyons (R)Y    MacGregor (R)Y    MacMaster (R)
  n  McBroom (R)  n  McCann (D)Y    McMillin (R)  n  Meadows (D)Y    Moss (R)
Y    Muxlow (R)  n  Nathan (D)Y    Nesbitt (R)Y    O'Brien (R)  n  Oakes (D)
Y    Olson (R)  n  Olumba (D)Y    Opsommer (R)Y    Ouimet (R)Y    Outman (R)
Y    Pettalia (R)Y    Poleski (R)Y    Potvin (R)Y    Price (R)Y    Pscholka (R)
Y    Rendon (R)Y    Rogers (R)  n  Rutledge (D)  n  Santana (D)Y    Schmidt, R. (R)
Y    Schmidt, W. (R)  n  Segal (D)Y    Shaughnessy (R)Y    Shirkey (R)  n  Slavens (D)
  n  Smiley (D)  n  Somerville (R)  n  Stallworth (D)Y    Stamas (R)  n  Stanley (D)
  n  Stapleton (D)  n  Switalski (D)  n  Talabi (D)  n  Tlaib (D)  n  Townsend (D)
Y    Tyler (R)Y    Walsh (R)  -  Womack (D)Y    Yonker (R)  n  Zorn (R)

House Roll Call 721 on 2011 House Bill 4003

Line

Comments

Re: 2011 House Bill 4003 (Ban “stealth" unionization of independent contractors )  by savorstste59 on February 2, 2012 

 Again we see our so-called conservative republican leaders falling into a liberal   pattern of raising taxes to support a never ending revenue hodgepodge. This mindset continues to drain monies away from earners and place it in the hands of incompetent lazy politicians who remain convinced that they know best. Until we remove all these tax and spend individuals we will never get to keep what we earn.The Senate needs a walk to the wood shed by the angry voters of Michigan. Regarding HB 4003 the message is clear union money stolen from home healthcare workers does not seem to be a priority to most in Lansing, remember who these chair warmers are come election time. For Rick Snyder sitting on the fence regarding RTW is the cowards way out and sends a clear message to all of us that a nerd can be bullied.



Re: 2011 House Bill 4003 (Ban “stealth" unionization of independent contractors )  by Dutchbob on February 1, 2012 
I want the money being taken by SEIU to be used for my son instead. That money is better served by providing an extra meal for him, not into the hands of the SEIU. Government at both state and federal levels have given unions way too much power to allow them to deduct wages from paychecks without permission from the wage earners. Unionization should not be required for employment in any situation. I'm not saying get rid of unions altogether, but to allow people to choose for themselves whether or not they wish to be in a union. And if they choose not to, they should not be discriminated against or treated differently in the workplace.

Re: 2011 House Bill 4003 (Ban “stealth" unionization of independent contractors )  by BarbaraBrown on May 27, 2011 

It seems to me like SEIU has bought off or threatened enough Republicans to keep this from moving forward.  They went ahead and defunded the sham child care agency and stopped the dues grab by the UAW. But the SEIU is still raking in the dough off the providers who care for disable adults -- six million a year and no one is doing anything about it.  It's a scam and even the GOP and the MAckinac Center are in on it in Michigan protecting the SEIU.  


I really wish the Teaparty would take a good hard look at this!


 



View pre-2013 Comments.
Your new comments should be made in the box below.