Legislation watch
Irma Clark-Coleman (D)
State Senator, District 3
Hometown:
Contact Sen. Irma Clark-Coleman (D)
View campaign contributions to Sen. Irma Clark-Coleman (D)
Missed Votes
- Did not vote on a motion for 2009 Senate Bill 641 (Retroactively repeal “supportive housing” tax break tie-bar ). The motion passed in the Senate (32 to 0) on October 29, 2009. [Vote Details and Comments]
- Did not vote on 2009 House Bill 4447 (Appropriations: 2009-2010 School Aid budget ). Passed in the Senate (20 to 13) on October 8, 2009, the FY 2009-2010 School Aid budget. This would appropriate $12.887 billion, compared to $13.378 billion enrolled in 2008 (and $110 million more than the first conference). Following intense lobbying by school employee unions the per pupil school aid cut is reduced from $218 to $165, and the 44 percent cut in Intermediate School District operations funding will be 20 percent instead. [Vote Details and Comments]
- Did not vote on an amendment for 2009 Senate Bill 838 (Create legislative “vehicle” for business tax hike ). The amendment passed in the Senate (32 to 1) on October 8, 2009, to remove provisions that would have reduced the value of certain research and development tax credits. [Vote Details and Comments]
- Did not vote on an amendment for 2009 Senate Bill 838 (Create legislative “vehicle” for business tax hike ). The amendment passed in the Senate (25 to 8) on October 8, 2009, to increase the residency standards for film studio employees that make a production eligible for subsidies. Currently they must have lived in the state for at least 60 days, and the bill would increase this to 180 days. Also, in increase the subsidy for film "infrastructure" projects from 25 percent to 32 percent of the expenses incurred by the developer. [Vote Details and Comments]
- Did not vote on a motion for 2009 House Bill 4514 (Require six months residency for EITC ). The motion passed in the Senate (21 to 12) on October 8, 2009. [Vote Details and Comments]
- Did not vote on an amendment for 2009 House Bill 4514 (Require six months residency for EITC ). The amendment passed in the Senate (19 to 13) on October 8, 2009, to tie-bar the bill to Senate Bills 838 and 884, meaning this bill cannot become law unless those ones do also. They would reduce the Michigan Business Tax surcharge, slighty reduce the value of film production subsidies, and authorize a "tax amnesty" period. [Vote Details and Comments]
- Did not vote on 2009 Senate Bill 253 (Appropriations: 2009-2010 State Police ). Failed in the Senate (17 to 10) on September 30, 2009, to reconsider the vote by which the conference report was not adopted. [Vote Details and Comments]
- Did not vote on 2009 Senate Bill 838 (Create legislative “vehicle” for business tax hike ). Passed in the Senate (19 to 14) on October 8, 2009, to lower the Michigan Business Tax surcharge from 22 percent to 14.66 percent in 2010, 7.33 percent in 2011, and zero after that (unless the legislature later suspends the phase-out); slightly lower the value of film production subsidies and cap at $1 million any one production's subsidy; cap certain targeted tax breaks; raise the caps on the maximum share of a business’s income that the proprietor or shareholder of a small business can receive and still be eligible for a lower small business MBT rate; earmark $100 million in MBT revenue to schools; and make other MBT revisions. [Vote Details and Comments]
- Did not vote on an amendment for 2009 House Bill 4436 (Appropriations: 2009-2010 Department of Community Health budget ). The amendment failed in the Senate (14 to 21) on June 24, 2009, to strip out a provision requiring the department to identify a private vendor to provide durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies for individuals enrolled in the fee-for-service Medicaid program. [Vote Details and Comments]
- Did not vote on 2009 Senate Bill 557 (Impose restrictions on utility shutoff for nonpayment ). Passed in the Senate (34 to 0) on October 8, 2009, to give the state Attorney General or any customer the authority to sue a municipal utility that failed to comply with restrictions on shutting off the service of a customer who hasn’t paid his or her bills, if the shutoff caused injury or death. [Vote Details and Comments]
