Introduced
by
To increase from $5,000 to $10,000 per day the fine for violating the restrictions and permit requirements imposed by the new <a href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/2005-SB-850">law </a> subjecting commercial, industrial and municipal water use to extensive government regulation. The bill is part of a <a href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/2007-SB-212">legislative package</a> implementing the proposed <a href="http://www.cglg.org/projects/water/docs/12-13-05/Great_Lakes-St_Lawrence_River_Basin_Water_Resources_Compact.pdf ">Great Lakes—St. Lawrence River Basin Water Resources Compact</a> on Michigan industrial, commercial and municipal ground and surface water users. Essentially, the new compact repeals the veto that each Great Lakes state has on diversions of water to outside the Great Lakes basin, and replaces it with restrictions on water use both inside and outside the basin. Note: Michigan is the only state entirely located inside the Great Lakes basin.
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (S-3) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details based on extensive testimony and negotiations. This would become the main bill in a revised groundwater regulatory regime. Significantly, the Department of Environmental Quality would only be authorized to enforce provisions or impose fees contained in statutes actually passed by the legislature, rather than being empowered to impose regulations it promulgates independently.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To prohibit a regulated water withdrawal which may reduce certain measures of fish populations in a coldwater stream by 1 percent, rather than 3 percent as proposed by the bill.
The amendment failed 19 to 19 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To base the application of the proposed and current regulations not the magnitude of a particular user's actual use of groundwater, but on its capacity to use groundwater.
The amendment failed 17 to 21 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To prohibit allowing an increased surface water flow made possible by "restorative measures" unrelated to a particular user's groundwater withdrawal permit as the basis for allowing a permit that would otherwise be prohbited on the basis of flows that would exist without those restorative measures. If the restorative measures are related to the particular user, in that they are part of the particular user's permit agreement, then this restriction would not apply.
The amendment failed 18 to 19 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To prohibit a groundwater withdrawal of more than 200,000 gallons per day if it would reduce the flow of a river or stream by more than 75 percent.
The amendment failed 17 to 21 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To establish that groundwater is a "public trust" in the same fashion as surface water (streams and lakes). This would in effect repeal the riparian water use doctrine of Michigan law, which establishes that a property owner has a property right to the use of groundwater drawn from beneath his or her land, as long as this does not interfere with another person’s use of groundwater. Instead, property owners would not have a have an ownership right, but could use groundwater only if the state grants permission.
The amendment failed 19 to 18 (details)
Passed in the Senate 24 to 14 (details)
To prohibit groundwater withdrawals of more than 2 million gallons per day by industrial or commercial users if these affect various types of surface water resources in ways defined by the bill, as determined by a computer program "assessment tool" using factors such as fish populations and water flow levels. The Department of Environmental Quality would only be authorized to enforce provisions or impose fees contained in the statute actually passed by the legislature, rather than being empowered to promulgate additional regulations independently. See <a href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/2007-SB-212">Senate Bill 212</a>, which places in Michigan statute the proposed <a href="http://www.cglg.org/projects/water/docs/12-13-05/Great_Lakes-St_Lawrence_River_Basin_Water_Resources_Compact.pdf ">Great Lakes—St. Lawrence River Basin Water Resources Compact</a>.
Referred to the Committee on Great Lakes and Environment
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-2) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that divides the provisions of the Senate-passed version of the bill among this bill and House Bill 5067. The latter bill lowers the permit mandate and withdrawal prohibition threshold proposed by the Senate-passed version of this bill to 1 million gallons in some parts of the state and 2 million gallons in others.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 108 to 0 (details)
To establish a computer program "assessment tool" to estimate using factors such as fish populations and surface-water flow levels whether a particular groundwater withdrawal by an industrial or commercial user would require registration, a permit or would be prohibited. The Department of Environmental Quality would only be authorized to enforce provisions or impose fees contained in the statute actually passed by the legislature, rather than being empowered to promulgate additional regulations independently. See <a href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/2007-SB-212">Senate Bill 212</a>, which places in Michigan statute the proposed <a href="http://www.cglg.org/projects/water/docs/12-13-05/Great_Lakes-St_Lawrence_River_Basin_Water_Resources_Compact.pdf ">Great Lakes—St. Lawrence River Basin Water Resources Compact</a>.
Passed in the Senate 35 to 0 (details)
To concur with the House-passed version of the bill, which divides the provisions of the Senate-passed version among this bill and House Bill 5067. The latter lowers the Senate-passed permit mandate and groudwater withdrawal prohibition threshold to 1 million gallons in some parts of the state and 2 million gallons in others.
