Introduced
by
To enter an agreement with other states to facilitate doctors getting licensed in more than one state. The measure is primarily supported by hospitals, and would not eliminate the need for doctors to get a separate license to practice in each state, and would not change current restrictions on the practice of telemedicine. It would also require that doctors hold one of the “board certifications” that some national organizations make money offering, which would exclude most Michigan practitioners.
Referred to the Committee on Health Policy
Reported without amendment
Without amendment and with the recommendation that the bill pass.
Passed in the House 100 to 6 (details)
To enter an agreement with other states to facilitate doctors getting licensed in more than one state. The measure is primarily supported by hospitals, and would not eliminate the need for doctors to get a separate license to practice in each state, or change current restrictions on the practice of telemedicine. It would require doctors to hold one of the “board certifications” that some national organizations that make money offering, which would exclude most Michigan practitioners.
Referred to the Committee on Health Policy
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Passed in the Senate 36 to 1 (details)
To enter an agreement with other states to facilitate doctors getting licensed in more than one state. The measure is primarily supported by hospitals, and would not eliminate the need for doctors to get a separate license to practice in each state, or change current restrictions on the practice of telemedicine. It would require doctors to hold one of the “board certifications” that some national organizations that make money offering, which would exclude most Michigan practitioners.
Passed in the House 103 to 6 (details)
To concur with the Senate-passed version of the bill.
