Introduced
by
To revise the powers of a state Certificate of Need (CON) commission that are related to “capital expenditures” for a new hospital or clinic, or expansion of an existing one. This commission has the power to approve or deny facility expansions, as well as any changes in the location, purpose or number of beds allowed in an existing facility, or plans to offer more clinical services. The Senate Fiscal Agency reports that the proposed change would have little practical effect because these regulated capital expenditures “are used to finance expansions of facilities and those expansions themselves require a certificate of need” from the commission.<br> This and related bills would also revise the population threshold in a provision that requires a provider to get CON permission to “relocate its licensed beds.” Michigan's CON law and similar laws in other states were enacted under a federal mandate in the 1970s with the intention of lowering health care spending by reducing investment in the field; 15 states have repealed the laws but 35 states including Michigan still have them.
Referred to the Committee on Health Policy and Human Services
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Passed in the Senate 21 to 16 (details)
To revise the powers of a state Certificate of Need (CON) commission related to “capital expenditures” for a new hospital or clinic, or expansion of an existing one. This commission has the power to approve or deny these investments, as well as any changes in the location, purpose or number of beds allowed in an existing facility, or plans to start or expand current clinical services. The Senate Fiscal Agency reports that the proposed change would have little practical effect because these regulated capital expenditures “are used to finance expansions of facilities and those expansions themselves require a certificate of need” from the commission.<br> This and related bills would also revise the population threshold in a provision that requires a provider to get CON permission to “relocate its licensed beds.” This and similar laws in other states were enacted under a federal mandate in the 1970s with the intention of lowering health care spending by reducing investment in the field; 15 states have repealed the laws but 35 states including Michigan still have them.
Referred to the Committee on Health Policy
Reported without amendment
Refer to the Committee on Ways and Means with the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted.
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-3) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
by
To adopt a version of the bill that eliminates certain restrictions on hospital companies with Detroit facilities transferring beds from one facility to another.
The substitute failed by voice vote
Substitute offered
by
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To authorize waivers during an epidemic from certain restrictions in a "Certificate of Need" law that rations hospitals and other medical facilities.
The amendment failed by voice vote
Passed in the House 60 to 42 (details)
To create an exception in a state "Certificate of Need" hospital rationing law that currently restricts a psychiatric hospital in a small county (less than 40,000 population) from transferring beds to another facility.
Passed in the Senate 21 to 16 (details)
