Introduced
by
The executive recommendation for the FY 2001-2002 Department of Environmental Quality budget. This appropriates $398.7 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), an increase of 1.7 percent compared to the current year’s $391.99 million, which was the amount enacted in 2000. Of this, $103.1 million will come from the General Fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the current year’s $99.9 million, an increase of 3.2 percent.
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations
Substitute offered
Which reflects changes adopted following committee testimony and discussion.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To require new reporting and record keeping requirements before any efforts are made to privatize any government functions funded by this budget.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To require the DEQ to submit to the legislature a report on regulatory actions in the current fiscal year.
The amendment passed 109 to 0 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To require the DEQ to submit to the legislature a detailed report on the activities of the department's internal auditor.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To require the DEQ to spend half the revenue from regulatory fines and penalties in the communities where the revenue was generated.
The amendment failed 53 to 56 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To make a statement of legislative intent that the DEQ should spend more on water pollution control in small rural communities.
The amendment passed 57 to 51 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To prohibit any new permits for the extraction of oil or gas from beneath the Great Lakes by means of "slant drilling".
The amendment failed 52 to 55 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To require the DEQ to submit to the legislature a comprehensive report on the expenditures, activities, and results of spending funded by the Clean Michigan Initiative, which was a $675 million environmental bond issue authorized by voters in 1998.
The amendment passed 103 to 2 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To prohibit the granting of any new permits for the extraction of oil or gas from beneath the Great Lakes by means of "slant drilling" until authorized by the Natural Resources Commission and the legislature.
The amendment failed 54 to 54 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To prohibit any new permits for the extraction of oil or gas from beneath the Great Lakes by means of "slant drilling".
The amendment passed 93 to 10 (details)
Amendment offered
by
The amendment failed 54 to 52 (details)
Passed in the House 89 to 17 (details)
To adopt a House version for the FY 2001-2002 Department of Environmental Quality budget. This appropriates $399.0 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), an increase of 1.7 percent compared to the current year’s $391.99 million, which was the amount enacted in 2000. Of this, $103.2 million will come from the General Fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the current year’s $99.9 million, an increase of 3.3 percent..
Substitute offered
Which was passed by the Senate, with an amendment added that prohibits the extraction of oil or gas from beneath the Great Lakes by means of on-shore "slant drilling," unless extensive new regulations are required.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To prohibit the extraction of oil or gas from beneath the Great Lakes by means of "slant drilling" unless certain regulations are adopted.
The amendment passed 18 to 14 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To require more to be appropriated for to volunteer lake, river, stream, and creek cleanup.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To require the DEQ to submit to the legislature a comprehensive report on environmental enforcement programs. This replaces language in the bill requiring a report on the department's efforts to automate permit, complaint, inspection, and investigation information for environmental programs.
The amendment failed 15 to 18 (details)
Passed in the Senate 20 to 13 (details)
To adopt a Senate version for the FY 2001-2002 Department of Environmental Quality budget. This appropriates $399.0 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), an increase of 1.8 percent compared to the current year’s $391.99 million, which was the amount enacted in 2000. Of this, $103.2 million will come from the General Fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the current year’s $99.9 million, an increase of 3.3 percent..
Failed in the House 1 to 105 (details)
A Senate-passed version of the bill, and sent it to a House-Senate conference committee to work out the differences.
Passed in the Senate 34 to 0 (details)
To adopt a House-Senate conference report for the FY 2001-2002 Department of Environmental Quality budget. This appropriates $397 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), an increase of 1.2 percent compared to the current year’s $391.99 million, which was the amount enacted in 2000. Of this, $101 million will come from the General Fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the current year’s $99.9 million, an increase of 1.1 percent..
Received
Passed in the House 101 to 5 (details)
