Introduced
by
To cap the size of a bond a defendant is required to post in order to appeal a civil judgement, unless a preponderance of the evidence indicates that the assets covered under the judgement are being dissipated or diverted to avoid payment.
Referred to the Committee on Civil Law and the Judiciary
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with a version recommended by the committee which reported it. The substitute incorporates changes resulting from committee testimony and deliberation. These changes do not affect the substance of the bill as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To move back the date the bill goes into effect.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 100 to 0 (details)
To cap the size of a bond a defendant is required to post in order to appeal a civil judgement, unless a preponderance of the evidence indicates that the assets covered under the judgement are being dissipated or diverted to avoid payment.
Passed in the Senate 37 to 0 (details)