Introduced
by
To require fingerprinting if a person is arrested for criminal contempt for violating a personal protection order enjoining domestic violence or stalking.
Referred to the Committee on Judiciary
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with a version recommended by the committee which reported it. The substitute incorporates changes resulting from committee testimony and deliberation. These changes do not affect the substance of the bill as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 35 to 0 (details)
To require fingerprinting if a person is arrested for criminal contempt for violating a personal protection order enjoining domestic violence or stalking.
Substitute offered
by
To replace the previous version of the bill with a version recommended by the committee which reported it. The substitute incorporates changes resulting from committee testimony and deliberation. These changes do not affect the substance of the bill as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 105 to 0 (details)
To require fingerprinting if a person is arrested for criminal contempt for violating a personal protection order enjoining domestic violence or stalking.
Passed in the Senate 35 to 0 (details)
To concur with the House-passed version of the bill.