Introduced
by
The executive recommendation for the FY 2002-2003 Department of Consumer and Industry Services budget. This appropriates $570.0 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including special state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), compared to $569.8 million, which was the FY 2001-2002 amount enacted in 2001, excluding any supplemental appropriations. Of this, $37.9 million will come from the General Fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to $42.7 million. ($4.9 million GF was cut from this amount in a November, 2001 budget-balancing executive order, bringing actual FY 2002 GF appropriations to $37.8 million).
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations
Substitute offered
To replace the executive recommendation for the bill with a version which makes no changes in the funding amounts, and minor changes in certain “boilerplate” language requiring or prohibiting various conditions and actions.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To require that of the $60 million appropriated for low-income/energy efficiency programs, $27 million go to low-income shutoff protection programs, $6 million go to pay past-due utility bills of welfare clients, $6 million go to energy efficiency programs, and $9 million go to weatherization programs.
The amendment failed by voice vote
Passed in the House 106 to 3 (details)
The House version of the FY 2002-2003 Department of Consumer and Industry Services budget. This appropriates $570.0 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including special state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), compared to $569.8 million, which was the FY 2001-2002 amount enacted in 2001, excluding any supplemental appropriations. Of this, $37.9 million will come from the General Fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to $42.7 million. ($4.9 million GF was cut from this amount in a November, 2001 budget-balancing executive order, bringing actual FY 2002 GF appropriations to $37.8 million).
Substitute offered
To replace the House-passed version of the bill with a version which makes minor changes in the funding amounts, and in certain “boilerplate” language requiring or prohibiting various conditions and actions. The substitute adds $125,000 for a nursing workforce, planning, recruitment and retention study.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To require the Bureau of Worker's and Unemployment Compensation to retain six workers comp mediators following a reorganization of the division. This reorganization would reduce the number of mediators from 11 to four.
The amendment failed 15 to 21 (details)
Passed in the Senate 36 to 0 (details)
The Senate version of the FY 2002-2003 Department of Consumer and Industry Services budget. This appropriates $570.6 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including special state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), compared to $569.8 million, which was the FY 2001-2002 amount enacted in 2001, excluding any supplemental appropriations. Of this, $37.9 million will come from the General Fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to $42.7 million in FY 2001-2002. ($4.9 million GF was cut from this amount in a November, 2001 budget-balancing executive order, bringing actual FY 2002 GF appropriations to $37.8 million).
Substitute offered
by
To replace the Senate-passed version of this budget with a version which makes several changes in the funding amounts, and in certain “boilerplate” language requiring or prohibiting various conditions and actions. The action will send the bill back to the Senate.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 97 to 3 (details)
Failed in the Senate 0 to 36 (details)
To concur with a House-passed version of the bill. The vote sends the bill to a House-Senate conference committee to work out the differences.
Passed in the House 58 to 41 (details)
The House-Senate conference report for the FY 2002-2003 Department of Consumer and Industry Services budget. This appropriates $554.9 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including special state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), compared to $569.8 million, which was the FY 2001-2002 amount enacted in 2001, excluding any supplemental appropriations. Of this, $35.9 million will come from the General Fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to $42.7 million in FY 2001-2002. Note: The FY 2001-2002 figures do not include supplemental appropriations, interdepartmental program shifts, funding source shifts, or cuts made by executive order later in the fiscal year, if any. These can be substantial, and will change the appearance of year-to-year comparisons. The conference report includes a number of specific line item cuts but states that these would restored if a tobacco tax is approved. It also provides for a one-percent department-wide operational expenses cut, with the specifics to be determined by the department.
Passed in the Senate 21 to 16 (details)
The House-Senate conference report for the FY 2002-2003 Department of Consumer and Industry Services budget. This appropriates $554.9 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including special state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), compared to $569.8 million, which was the FY 2001-2002 amount enacted in 2001, excluding any supplemental appropriations. Of this, $35.9 million will come from the General Fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to $42.7 million in FY 2001-2002. Note: The FY 2001-2002 figures do not include supplemental appropriations, interdepartmental program shifts, funding source shifts, or cuts made by executive order later in the fiscal year, if any. These can be substantial, and will change the appearance of year-to-year comparisons. The conference report includes a number of specific line item cuts, but states that these would be suspended if the tobacco and cigarette tax is increased. This tax increase has been approved, so the actual appropriations will be higher than the nominal line item amounts. It also provides for a one-percent department-wide operational expenses cut, with the specifics to be determined by the department.
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations
