Introduced
by
To allow the transfer of escrowed on-premises liquor licenses to an establishment in a different community within a county. Under current statute, this is the law for every county except Kent.
Referred to the Committee on Regulatory Reform
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-3) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one which would not apply its provisions to licenses being transferred to or from establishments in Grand Rapids.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 99 to 6 (details)
To allow the transfer of escrowed on-premises liquor licenses to an establishment in a different community within a county, except that this would not apply to licenses being transferred to or from establishments in Grand Rapids. Under current statute, transfer between communities is allowed in every county except Kent.
Referred to the Committee on Economic Development, Small Business, and Regulatory Reform
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that eliminates the Grand Rapids exemption in 2009.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 35 to 1 (details)
To allow the transfer of escrowed on-premises liquor licenses to an establishment in a different community within a county, except that this would not apply to licenses being transferred to or from establishments in Grand Rapids until 2009. Under current statute, transfer between communities is allowed in every county except Kent.
Passed in the House 95 to 9 (details)
To concur with the Senate-passed version of the bill.
