Introduced
by
To establish that in civil cases where a judge has ordered the losing party to make installment payments to the winner, the loser’s bank account or tax refund could not also be subject to garnishment.
Referred to the Committee on Judiciary
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-2) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that removes the provision extending the bill to tax tax refund money.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 101 to 2 (details)
To establish that in civil cases where a judge has ordered the losing party to make installment payments to the winner, money in a bank account earned by the loser from personal work and labor could not also be subject to garnishment. This would not apply to garnishment orders in effect before the installment payment order.
Referred to the Committee on Judiciary