Introduced
by
To revise certain village election dates required in the transition to the new election consolidation law created by House Bills 4820 to 4828 and Senate Bill 877. The bill does not change the system created by that law of all elections taking place on one of four days throughout the year, but does give villages more flexibility in selecting among the four dates. It is part of a legislative package making technical changes to the new system, which begins Jan. 1, 2005.
Referred to the Committee on Local Government and Urban Policy
Reported without amendment
Without amendment and with the recommendation that the bill pass.
Amendment offered
by
To revise the election days that a city council may select for its regular elections.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 107 to 0 (details)
To revise certain village and city election dates required in the transition to the new election consolidation law created by House Bills 4820 to 4828 and Senate Bill 877. The bill does not change the system created by that law of all elections taking place on one of four days throughout the year, but does give certain local governments more flexibility in selecting among the four dates. It is part of a legislative package making technical changes to the new system, which begins Jan. 1, 2005.
Referred to the Committee on Government Operations and Reform
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the bill pass.
Passed in the Senate 36 to 0 (details)
To revise certain village and city election dates required in the transition to the new election consolidation law created by House Bills 4820 to 4828 and Senate Bill 877. The bill does not change the system created by that law of all elections taking place on one of four days throughout the year, but does give certain local governments more flexibility in selecting among the four dates. It is part of a legislative package making technical changes to the new system, which begins Jan. 1, 2005.
