Introduced
by
To clarify in statute that a general law village may establish staggered terms for its elected officials. The bill is part of a legislative package that makes technical or detail changes to the <a href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/2003-HB-4824">election consolidation</a> law passed in 2003.
Referred to the Committee on Government Operations and Reform
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one containing technical changes that do not affect its substance as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 37 to 0 (details)
Referred to the Committee on Oversight, Elections, and Ethics
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one containing technical changes that do not affect its substance as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To clarify the procedures required for a village to adopt staggered terms.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 110 to 0 (details)
To clarify in statute that a general law village may establish staggered terms for its elected officials. The bill is part of a legislative package that makes technical or detail changes to the <a href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/2003-HB-4824">election consolidation</a> law passed in 2003.
Passed in the Senate 37 to 0 (details)
To concur with the House-passed version of the bill.
