Introduced
by
To require the revocation of parole for individuals convicted of certain crimes who violate the terms of their parole, and revise the parole hearing procedures to require greater oversight. This is one of the legislative responses to the notorious case of a parole-violating criminal (Patrick Selepak) who committed a horrific double-murder in 2006 after being improperly released.
Referred to the Committee on Judiciary
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of the bill as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To clarify a reference to parole violation hearings by making it more explicit.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 106 to 0 (details)
Referred to the Committee on Judiciary
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of the bill as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 37 to 0 (details)
To require the revocation of parole for individuals convicted of certain crimes who violate the terms of their parole, and revise the parole hearing procedures to require greater oversight. This is one of the legislative responses to the notorious case of a parole-violating criminal (Patrick Selepak) who committed a horrific double-murder in 2006 after being improperly released.
Passed in the House 104 to 0 (details)
To concur with the Senate-passed version of the bill.
