Introduced
by
To expand the property tax breaks authorized under the <a href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/2005-HB-4369">Commercial Redevelopment Act of 2005</a> to residential projects, and loosen other eligibility requirements. That Act was passed with obsolete shopping malls in mind (in particular the Summit Place Mall in Oakland County) and allowed them to be renovated without increasing their property taxes.
Referred to the Committee on Commerce
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises various details, but does not change its substance. This version was subsequently superceded by another substitute with more changes.
The substitute failed by voice vote
Substitute offered
by
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of the bill as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To clarify that one of the tax breaks allowed under the bill is only allowed of the project has also been granted certain federal tax breaks.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 105 to 0 (details)
Referred to the Committee on Economic Development, Small Business, and Regulatory Reform
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the bill pass.
Passed in the Senate 37 to 1 (details)
To expand the property tax breaks authorized under the <a href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/2005-HB-4369">Commercial Redevelopment Act of 2005</a> to residential projects, and loosen other eligibility requirements. That Act was passed with obsolete shopping malls in mind (in particular the Summit Place Mall in Oakland County) and allowed them to be renovated without increasing their property taxes.
