Introduced
by
To establish that a criminal whose parole has been revoked because of a violation need not be released simply because a 45 day time limit on holding a fact finding hearing has been exceeded. This may be one of the factors that resulted in the notorious case of a parole-violating criminal (Patrick Selepak) who committed a horrific double-murder in 2006 after being improperly released.
Referred to the Committee on Judiciary
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the bill pass.
Passed in the Senate 36 to 0 (details)
Referred to the Committee on Judiciary
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of the bill as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 106 to 0 (details)
To establish that a criminal whose parole has been revoked because of a violation need not be released simply because a 45 day time limit on holding a fact finding hearing has been exceeded. This may be one of the factors that resulted in the notorious case of a parole-violating criminal (Patrick Selepak) who committed a horrific double-murder in 2006 after being improperly released.
Passed in the Senate 36 to 0 (details)
