Introduced
by
To allow defendants required to attend "drug treatment courts" (which are actually a type of rehab program) to attend the programs offered in jurisdictions other than where they were convicted, and make mandatory what had been certain content guidelines for drug treatment courts. The bill also would require that a drug court comply with the 10 key components promulgated by the National Association of Drug Court Professionals. Under current law, a drug court "should" comply with these.
Referred to the Committee on Judiciary
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of the bill as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 36 to 0 (details)
Referred to the Committee on Judiciary
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of the bill as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 107 to 0 (details)
To allow defendants required to attend "drug treatment courts" (which are actually a type of rehab program) to attend the programs offered in jurisdictions other than where they were convicted, and make mandatory what had been certain content guidelines for drug treatment courts. The bill also would require that a drug court comply with the 10 key components promulgated by the National Association of Drug Court Professionals. Under current law, a drug court "should" comply with these.
To concur with the House-passed version of the bill.
Passed in the Senate 36 to 0 (details)
