Introduced
by
To increase certain air pollution emission fees.
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations
Substitute offered
by
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of this fee (tax) increase. Although the substitute passed on a voice vote, a few minutes later a majority could not be summmoned in the record roll vote required for final passage, and so the vote was called off for the time being.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Substitute offered
by
To adopt a version that would increase various industrial air emissions permit fees by various amounts totalling approximately $10 million in the aggregate.
The substitute failed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To adopt a version that merely rewords statutory language in a non-substantive way. This is a means of sending the bill to the Senate as a "placeholder" that can be quickly amended and passed as the large fee increase contemplated in September.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 62 to 45 (details)
To reword statutory language in the law authorizing air emissions fees in a non-substantive way. This is a means of sending the bill to the Senate as a "placeholder" that can be quickly amended and passed as the large fee increase contemplated in September.
Substitute offered
To adopt a version that limits what the DEQ can consider in power plant permit decisions - see Senate-passed version.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 21 to 15 (details)
To prohibit the Department of Environmental Quality from basing electric generating plant permit decisions on factors other than ones related to pollution, such as whether the agency thinks the state needs the plant or the owner should look for alternative forms of electricity.
Motion to reconsider
by
Passage of the bill.
The motion passed by voice vote
Received
To prohibit the Department of Environmental Quality from basing electric generating plant permit decisions on factors other than ones related to pollution, such as whether the agency thinks the state needs the plant or the owner should look for alternative forms of electricity.
Passed in the Senate 21 to 16 (details)
Failed in the House 43 to 54 (details)
Motion
by
The motion passed by voice vote