Introduced
by
To establish a procedure to allow a candidate for municipal court of record judge who signs an affidavit that he or she got bad information from election officials regarding nominating petition signature requirements to be given a second chance to get the proper number of signatures.
Referred to the Committee on Judiciary
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the bill pass.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of the bill as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To establish that the "do over" nominating petitions are subject to challenge just like regular petitions.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 36 to 0 (details)
Referred to the Committee on Elections and Ethics
Reported without amendment
Without amendment and with the recommendation that the bill pass.
Passed in the House 104 to 0 (details)
To establish a procedure to allow a candidate for municipal court of record judge who signs an affidavit that he or she got bad information from election officials regarding nominating petition signature requirements to be given a second chance to get the proper number of signatures.
