Introduced
by
To revise details of the <a href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/2004-HB-5504">“Streamlined Sales Tax”</a> project being pursued by Michigan and most states, which if allowed by Congress would create a centralized system for states to collect use or sales tax on out-of-state internet or catalog purchases. The bill would narrow the tax “apportionment” provisions for companies that pay “business privilege” taxes (like the Michigan Business Tax) to more than one state.
Referred to the Committee on Tax Policy
Reported without amendment
Without amendment and with the recommendation that the bill pass.
Passed in the House 56 to 53 (details)
Referred to the Committee on Reforms, Restructuring, and Reinventing
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the bill pass.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 29 to 9 (details)
To revise details of the <A href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/2004-HB-5504">“Streamlined Sales Tax”</A> project being pursued by Michigan and most states, which if allowed by Congress would create a centralized system for states to collect use or sales tax on out-of-state internet or catalog purchases. The bill would narrow the tax “apportionment” provisions for companies that pay “business privilege” taxes (like the Michigan Business Tax or new state corporate income tax) to more than one state.
Passed in the House 56 to 52 (details)
To concur with the Senate-passed version of the bill.