Introduced
by
To revise which developers’ projects are eligible for "Commercial Rehabilitation Act" property tax breaks. Apparently this would benefit a property owner in Bridgman.
Referred to the Committee on Commerce
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To add a provision that would benefit the owner of a hotel in Oakland County.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 103 to 7 (details)
To revise which developers’ projects are eligible for "Commercial Rehabilitation Act" property tax breaks. This would benefit the owner of a hotel in Oakland County, and apparently a property owner in Bridgman.
Referred to the Committee on Economic Development
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the bill pass.
Passed in the Senate 36 to 2 (details)
To revise which developers’ projects are eligible for "Commercial Rehabilitation Act" property tax breaks. This would benefit the owner of a hotel in Oakland County, and apparently a property owner in Bridgman.