Introduced
by
To consolidate and reduce the number of judges in Michigan courts, as recommended by the state Supreme Court and the State Court Administrative Office. This is one of a number of such bills, and affects Arenac, Iosco, and Oscoda Counties.
Referred to the Committee on Judiciary
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To require a bill that also reduces the number of Court of Appeal judges from 28 to 24 to become law before this bill can, and also require a number of other regular court consolidation bills to become law.
The amendment failed by voice vote
Passed in the House 98 to 10 (details)
Referred to the Committee on Judiciary
Amendment offered
To clarify details of the consolidation of judgeships in the 82nd and 83rd districts.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 37 to 1 (details)
To consolidate and reduce the number of judges in Michigan courts, as recommended by the state Supreme Court and the State Court Administrative Office. This is one of a number of such bills, and affects Arenac, Iosco, and Oscoda Counties.
Passed in the House 96 to 12 (details)
To concur with the Senate-passed version of the bill.
