Introduced
by
To clarify that if the Detroit fire and police pension board member who is supposed to represent retirees is selected according to a method specified in the city charter, then deciding who to select would be a prohibited subject of collective bargaining with government employee unions, and any union agreement specifying a different person or method would be null and void. See also <a href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/2011-HB-4135">House Bill 4135</a>, now Public Act 25 of 2011, which dealt with the same issue.
Referred to the Committee on Oversight, Reform, and Ethics
Reported without amendment
Without amendment and with the recommendation that the bill pass.
Passed in the House 88 to 20 (details)
To clarify that if the Detroit fire and police pension board member who is supposed to represent retirees is selected according to a method specified in the city charter, then deciding who to select would be a prohibited subject of collective bargaining with government employee unions, and any union agreement specifying a different person or method would not be null and void. See also <A href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/2011-HB-4135">House Bill 4135</A>, now Public Act 25 of 2011, which dealt with the same issue.
Referred to the Committee on Reforms, Restructuring, and Reinventing
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the bill pass.
Substitute offered
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 35 to 2 (details)
To clarify that if the Detroit fire and police pension board member who is supposed to represent retirees is selected according to a method specified in the city charter, then deciding who to select would be a prohibited subject of collective bargaining with government employee unions, and any union agreement specifying a different person or method would be null and void. See also <a href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/2011-HB-4135">House Bill 4135</a>, now Public Act 25 of 2011, which dealt with the same issue.
Passed in the House 84 to 22 (details)
