Introduced
by
To provide a “template” or “place holder” for the Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Department of Agriculture and Rural Development budget. This bill contains no appropriations, but may be amended at a later date to include them.
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To adopt a version of this budget that expresses the fiscal and policy preferences of the Republican-majority in the Senate on various spending items and programs. For details see <a href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2011-2012/billanalysis/Senate/pdf/2011-SFA-0169-U.pdf">analysis</a> from the non-partisan Senate Fiscal Agency.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 28 to 10 (details)
The Senate version of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2011-2012 Department of Agriculture and Rural Development budget. This would appropriate $71.8 million in gross spending, compared to $76.4 million the previous year. Of this, $14.1 million will come from the federal government, $28.0 million from the state general fund, and most of the rest from certain earmarked taxes and fees.
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations
Substitute offered
To replace the House-passed version of the bill with one that replaces all the appropriations with $100 "placeholders," which is a means of advancing the budget to a House-Senate conference committee to work out the differences.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 62 to 45 (details)
To "adopt" a version of this budget, but in fact replace all the appropriations with $100 "placeholders." This is essentially a means for sending the budget to a House-Senate conference committee to work out the differences.
Failed in the Senate 0 to 38 (details)
To concur with a House-passed version of the bill. The vote sends the bill to a House-Senate conference committee to work out the differences.
Received
Passed in the Senate 33 to 4 (details)
The House-Senate conference report for the 2011-2012 Department of Agriculture and Rural Development budget. This would appropriate $72.2 million in gross spending, compared to $76.4 million the previous year. Of this, $14.1 million will come from the federal government, $28.7 million from the state general fund, and most of the rest from certain earmarked taxes and fees.
