Introduced
by
To establish new procedures, criteria and restrictions for the acquisition by the state of property paid for with Natural Resources Trust Fund money, and add two new members to the decision making board who would be appointed by the House Speaker and Senate Majority leader (subject to certain restrictions). Among other things, if land was acquired for transfer to a land conservancy without assurance it would have to be kept open for all types of recreational use.
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, Environment, and Great Lakes
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 26 to 11 (details)
To revise the procedures and criteria for the acquisition by the state of property paid for with Natural Resources Trust Fund money. Among other things, the bill would impose term limits on members of the board, require more transparency in the board's property selection process, and ban sales if the seller was harassed, intimidated, or coerced by the Department of Natural Resources, a local government, or a "qualified" conservation organization.
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, Tourism, and Outdoor Recreation
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To eliminate a proposed preference for acquisitions on which motorized recreational use would be allowed.
The amendment failed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To strip out the proposed term limits on NRTC board members.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To explicitly authorize the legislature to add its own projects to the NRTC acquisition list.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 65 to 44 (details)
To revise the procedures and criteria for the acquisition by the state of property paid for with Natural Resources Trust Fund money. Among other things, the bill would require more transparency in the board's property selection process, and ban sales if the seller was harassed, intimidated, or coerced by the Department of Natural Resources, a local government, or a "qualified" conservation organization.
Motion to reconsider
by
The vote by which the bill was passed.
The motion passed by voice vote
Received
Motion
by
To reconsider the vote by which the House adopted the Foster amendment.
The motion passed by voice vote
Motion to reconsider
To not adopt the Foster amendment after reconsideration.
The motion failed by voice vote
Passed in the House 65 to 41 (details)
To revise the procedures and criteria for the acquisition by the state of property paid for with Natural Resources Trust Fund money.
Passed in the Senate 26 to 12 (details)
To concur with the House-passed version of the bill.
