Introduced
by
To establish that providers of “internet-protocol enabled premises security systems,” for whom Senate Bill 1292 proposes a separate comprehensive licensure and regulatory regime, would not also be subject to licensure mandates under an existing law regulating security alarm system contractors and installers.
Referred to the Committee on Economic Development
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the bill pass.
Substitute offered
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 34 to 1 (details)
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Technology
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-2) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 102 to 5 (details)
To establish that providers of “internet-protocol enabled premises security systems,” for whom Senate Bill 1292 proposes a separate comprehensive licensure and regulatory regime, would not also be subject to licensure mandates under an existing law regulating security alarm system contractors and installers.
Passed in the Senate 34 to 2 (details)
To concur with the House-passed version of the bill.
