Introduced
by
To provide a “template” or “place holder” for the Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Department of Human Services budget. This bill contains no appropriations, but may be amended at a later date to include them.
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To increase spending and employees authorized several sections of the budget for the state welfare agency.
The amendment failed 12 to 26 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To eliminate a provision that appears to limit welfare-related clothing subsidies to teen mothers and their children.
The amendment failed 12 to 26 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To require the Department of Human Services to undertake a "thorough analysis of the possible impacts" of outsourcing any functions through competitive bidding.
The amendment failed 12 to 26 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To add to a required report on the number of applications for welfare, Medicaid and related programs information on the reasons for denying an application or ending benefits to a particular recipient ("case closure").
The amendment failed 13 to 25 (details)
Amendment offered
by
To prohibit granting any state welfare agency contracts to a private company or agency that has a "record of substantial or repeated willful noncompliance with any relevant federal, state, or local statute or regulation, including payment of taxes or other payments owed to a public entity".
The amendment passed 38 to 0 (details)
Passed in the Senate 25 to 13 (details)
The Senate version of the Department of Human Services budget for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1, 2014. This would appropriate $5.600 billion in gross spending, compared to $6.018 billion, which was the amount originally authorized for the current fiscal year. Of this, $3,845 billion is federal money, and the rest is from state and local taxes and fees. The decline in proposed spending is primarily due to reduced welfare and food stamp caseloads.
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations
Substitute offered
by
To adopt a version of the budget that contains no appropriations, but is instead intended to launch negotiations to work out the differences between the House and Senate budgets.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 109 to 0 (details)
To send the bill back to the Senate "stripped" of all actual appropriations. This vote is basically a procedural method of launching negotiations to work out the differences between the House and Senate budgets.
Failed in the Senate 0 to 37 (details)
Received
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations