Introduced
by
To revise a number of procedures and definitions in the state’s law on hazardous waste cleanups, which would generally streamline operation of the law and make it more accommodating to various types of properties, situations and circumstances. Among other things, the bill would recognize that when contaminated property (a “facility”) is split or subdivided, new parcels created by the split that are not contaminated would no longer be subject to restrictions that applied to the original parcel.
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, Environment, and Great Lakes
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Amendment offered
by
To expand the scope of some provisions in the bill and narrow others, with the general effect of making (or leaving) the law more specific and prescriptive regarding clean up actions.
Consideration postponed
Amendment offered
The amendment failed 16 to 22 (details)
Amendment offered
by
The amendment failed 15 to 23 (details)
Passed in the Senate 26 to 12 (details)
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-2) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Amendment offered
by
To expand the scope of some provisions in the bill and narrow others, with the general effect of making (or leaving) the law more specific and prescriptive regarding clean up actions. Among other things this would revise and expand the definition of "residential property" used in various clean up requirements.
The amendment failed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To mandate monitoring in all plans that address aquifer contamination.
The amendment failed by voice vote
Failed in the House 56 to 52 (details)
To revise a number of procedures and definitions in the state’s law on hazardous waste cleanups, which would generally streamline operation of the law and make it more accommodating to various types of properties, situations and circumstances. Among other things, the bill would recognize that when contaminated property (a “facility”) is split or subdivided, new parcels created by the split that are not contaminated would no longer be subject to restrictions that applied to the original parcel.
Passed in the Senate 26 to 11 (details)
To concur with the House-passed version of the bill.
