Introduced
by
To revise the rules for a condominium developer to get out of having to complete “must be built” improvements specified in the original master plan, but which (presumably) are no longer economically viable in a changed real estate market. Developers can do this under current law after a certain period, and the bill revises when that period begins and related details.
Referred to the Committee on Local Government
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Passed in the Senate 36 to 0 (details)
Referred to the Committee on Local Government and Municipal Finance
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Passed in the House 109 to 0 (details)
To revise the rules for a condominium developer to get out of having to complete “must be built” improvements specified in the original master plan, but which (presumably) are no longer economically viable in a changed real estate market. Developers can do this under current law after a certain period, and the bill revises when that period begins and related details.
Passed in the Senate 37 to 0 (details)
To concur with the House-passed version of the bill.
