Introduced
by
To revise restrictions on compensation paid to a professional guardian or conservator appointed by a court to act in the interest of a developmentally disabled, incapacitated or protected individual or a ward. The bill would accommodate a system being tried by some counties of giving these duties to a bureau staffed by paid guardians, because hiring outside professionals has become harder.
Referred to the Committee on Judiciary
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the bill pass.
Substitute offered
by
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance as previously described.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 36 to 0 (details)
Referred to the Committee on Judiciary
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
by
To adopt a version of the bill that would require a guardian to file a written statement with court detailing any compensation or benefit received from a third party.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 107 to 1 (details)
To revise restrictions on compensation paid to a professional guardian or conservator appointed by a court to act in the interest of a developmentally disabled, incapacitated or protected individual or a ward. The bill would accommodate a system being tried by some counties of giving these duties to a bureau staffed by paid guardians, because hiring outside professionals has become harder.
Passed in the Senate 36 to 0 (details)
To concur with the House-passed version of the bill.
