Introduced
by
To amend the definition of “brownfield” subsidies in a way that would make eligible a certain developer’s proposal as characterized in the bill.
Referred to the Committee on Economic and Small Business Development
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the bill pass.
Passed in the Senate 28 to 5 (details)
Motion to reconsider
by
He vote by which the bill was passed.
The motion passed by voice vote
Received
Passed in the Senate 29 to 5 (details)
To amend the definition of “brownfield” subsidies in a way that would make eligible a certain developer’s proposal as characterized in the bill.
Referred to the Committee on Local Government and Municipal Finance
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Amendment offered
by
To tie-bar passage of this bill to two non-binding House Resolutions, one asserting the House thinks the U.S. Supreme Court was right in 1965 when it deemed access to birth control measures a right, and the other asserting that the House supports access to contraception for all individuals.
The amendment failed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To tie-bar this bill to several others that would remove abortion restrictions from state statutes, meaning this bill cannot become law unless those ones do also (House Bills 4297, 5191 to 5193, 5289 and 5542).
The amendment failed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To tie-bar passage of this bill to adoption by voters of the proposal in House Joint Resolution J, which would make language in the state constitution "gender neutral," so as to accommodate the proposal in in HJR G to repeal the state constitution’s recognition of marriage as only between one man and woman, which was adopted by voters in 2004.
The amendment failed by voice vote
Passed in the House 97 to 9 (details)
To amend the definition of “brownfield” subsidies in a way that would make eligible a certain developer’s proposal as characterized in the bill.
Passed in the Senate 32 to 5 (details)