An act to amend 1939 PA 280, entitled “An act to protect the welfare of the people of this state; to provide general assistance, hospitalization, infirmary and medical care to poor or unfortunate persons; to provide for compliance by this state with the social security act; to provide protection, welfare and services to aged persons, dependent children, the blind, and the permanently and totally disabled; to administer programs and services for the prevention and treatment of delinquency, dependency and neglect of children; to create a state department of social services; to prescribe the powers and duties of the department; to provide for the interstate and intercounty transfer of dependents; to create county and district departments of social services; to create within certain county departments, bureaus of social aid and certain divisions and offices thereunder; to prescribe the powers and duties of the departments, bureaus and officers; to provide for appeals in certain cases; to prescribe the powers and duties of the state department with respect to county and district departments; to prescribe certain duties of certain other state departments, officers, and agencies; to make an appropriation; to prescribe penalties for the violation of the provisions of this act; and to repeal certain parts of this act on specific dates,” (MCL 400.1 to 400.119b) by adding sections 105i and 105j.
House Bill 4276 would require that, if the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) enters into a contract with a Medicaid managed care organization that relies on a pharmacy benefit manager, the pharmacy benefit manager must do all of the following: • For Michigan pharmacies with seven or fewer retail outlets, use a pharmacy reimbursement methodology of the lesser of national average drug acquisition cost plus a professional dispensing fee that is at least equal to to the applicable professional dispensing fee provided through section 1620 of Article 6 of 2020 PA 166 (see Background, below), wholesale acquisition cost plus a professional dispensing fee provided through that section, or the usual and customary charge by the pharmacy. The pharmacy benefit manager or the involved pharmacy services administrative organization could not receive any portion of the professional dispensing fee. DHHS would have to identify the pharmacies this provision applies to and provide the list of applicable pharmacies to the Michigan Medicaid managed care organizations. • Reimburse for a legally valid claim at a rate that is not less than the rate in effect at the time the original claim adjudication was submitted at the point of sale. • Agree to move to a transparent pass-through pricing model, in which the pharmacy benefit manager discloses the administrative fee as a percentage of the professional dispensing costs to DHHS. • Agree to not create new pharmacy administration fees and to not increase current fees more than the rate of inflation. This provision would not apply to any federal rule or action that creates a new fee. • Agree to not terminate an existing contract with a Michigan pharmacy with seven or fewer retail outlets for the sole reason of the additional professional dispensing fee authorized under the bill.
Co-sponsored by Reps.
Referred to the Committee on Health Policy
Reported with substitute H-3
Substitute H-3 concurred in by voice vote
Passed in the House 105 to 4 (details)
Motion to give immediate effect
by
The motion prevailed by voice vote
Referred to the Committee on Health Policy
Discharged from committee
Referred to the Committee of the Whole
Reported without amendment
Passed in the Senate 36 to 0 (details)