An act to require the supreme court to analyze certain trial court costs and revenue sources; to develop and recommend a certain trial court fee schedule; to develop and recommend a certain trial court debt collection system; and to develop and recommend certain legislative proposals to change trial court funding.
MI H.B.5534, known as the "Trial Court Funding Act of 2024," was enacted to reform the funding system for trial courts in Michigan. Key provisions include:
Analysis of Costs and Revenue: The Michigan Supreme Court is tasked with analyzing trial court costs and revenue sources. This includes developing a fee schedule for trial courts, recommending a debt collection system, and proposing legislative changes to support trial court funding.
Operational Costs Definition: The act defines operational costs to include necessary expenses such as technology and internet access but excludes costs unrelated to court operations like prosecution or defense expenses.
Maintenance of Effort: The state court administrative office will work with local governments to ensure funding reflects actual operational costs, excluding unrelated expenditures.
Revenue and Funding Analysis: By May 1, 2026, the state court administrative office must determine the impact of cost eliminations, operational costs of each trial court, and additional funding needs.
Fee Schedule and Collections System: A proposed fee schedule will be developed, aiming to reflect the actual cost of an average case. Additionally, a uniform system for collecting court debt will be proposed, potentially building on existing systems.
Pilot Program and Statewide System: The act allows for the development of a pilot program for court debt collections and requires the creation of a statewide system for distributing court revenue.
Reporting: A comprehensive report detailing the analysis of costs, revenue, and proposed legislative changes is due by May 1, 2026, to various state officials and legislative committees.
Introduced
by
Referred to the Committee on Judiciary
Reported with substitute H-1
Substitute H-1 concurred in by voice vote
1. Amend page 4, following line 10, by inserting:
“(h) Law enforcement agencies, including, but not limited to, the Michigan Association of Chiefs of Police and the Michigan Sheriffs’ Association.”.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 58 to 47 (details)
Motion to give immediate effect
by
The motion prevailed by voice vote
Referred to the Committee of the Whole
Reported without amendment
Substitute S-1 offered
by
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 20 to 17 (details)
Substitute S-1 not concurred in 53 to 52 (details)
Motion to reconsider substitute S-1
by
The motion prevailed by voice vote
Received
The substitute concurred in 56 to 51 (details)