To establish that when a no-fault auto insurance policy specifies that a member of the vehicle owner’s household is an “excluded driver” ineligible to collect unlimited personal protection benefits, and the person unlawfully takes the vehicle anyway, then any occupant who knows (or should have known) that a vehicle is unlawfully taken is also not eligible for benefits. Also, to include “transportation network companies” like Uber and Lyft in certain exceptions the unlimited personal injury protection benefits otherwise mandated by the state no fault insurance law.
| 101 Yeas / 8 Nays | |
|---|---|
| Excused or Not Voting (1) | |
|---|---|
