Introduced
by
The executive recommendation for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 Judiciary budget. This would appropriate $258.8 million in gross spending, compared to $258.7 million, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009. Of this, $152.7 million will come from the general fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the FY 2009-2010 amount of $153.1 million. $89.9 million is from state “restricted” funds, and $5.3 million is federal money.
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To adopt a version of this budget that expresses the fiscal and policy preferences of the Democratic-majority in the House on various spending items and programs. For details see <a href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2009-2010/billanalysis/House/pdf/2009-HLA-5883-3.pdf">analysis</a> from the non-partisan House Fiscal Agency.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Amendment offered
by
To require the Department to find ways to reduce the amount of general fund revenue used to support its operations by 3 percent.
The amendment passed by voice vote
Substitute offered
by
The Appropriations committee substitute. This was bypassed in favor of a version that contains additional changes in a few line items.
The substitute failed by voice vote
Passed in the House 61 to 48 (details)
The House verion of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 Judiciary budget. This would appropriate $258.8 million in gross spending, compared to $260.2 million, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009. Of this, $154.1 million will come from the general fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the FY 2009-2010 amount of $153.1 million. $89.9 million is from state “restricted” funds, and $5.3 million is federal money.
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered
To adopt a version of this budget that expresses the fiscal and policy preferences of the Republican-majority in the Senate on various spending items and programs. For details see <a href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2009-2010/billanalysis/Senate/pdf/2009-SFA-5883-U.pdf">analysis</a> from the non-partisan Senate Fiscal Agency.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 38 to 0 (details)
The Senate verion of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 Judiciary budget. This would appropriate $260.3 million in gross spending, compared to $260.2 million, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009. Of this, $151.5 million will come from the general fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the FY 2009-2010 amount of $153.1 million. $82.5 million is from state “restricted” funds, and $5.5 million is federal money.
To concur with a Senate-passed version of the bill. The vote sends the bill to a House-Senate conference committee to work out the differences.
Failed in the House 0 to 107 (details)
Received
The House-Senate conference report for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010-2011 Judiciary budget. This would appropriate $260.3 million in gross spending, compared to $260.2 million, which was the FY 2009-2010 amount enrolled in 2009. Of this, $152.0 million will come from the general fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the FY 2009-2010 amount of $153.1 million. $92.0 million is from state “restricted” funds, and $5.5 million is federal money.
Passed in the House 77 to 28 (details)
Passed in the Senate 37 to 0 (details)
