Introduced
by
To expand the list of communities that may seek reimbursement from inmates in county or city jails. A <a href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/2005-SB-208">2006 law</a> allowed this for communities in Kent, Macomb, Oakland, and Wayne Counties. The bill would expand this to Genesee, Ingham and Washtenaw Counties.
Referred to the Committee on Judiciary
Reported without amendment
With the recommendation that the bill pass.
Substitute offered
To replace the previous version of the bill with one that expands its provisions to all communities in the state.
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the Senate 37 to 0 (details)
To expand the list of communities that may seek reimbursement from inmates in county or city jails. A <A href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/2005-SB-208">2006 law</A> allowed this for communities in Kent, Macomb, Oakland, and Wayne Counties. The bill would expand this any community.
Referred to the Committee on Judiciary
Reported without amendment
Without amendment and with the recommendation that the bill pass.
Substitute offered
by
The substitute passed by voice vote
Passed in the House 108 to 1 (details)
To expand the list of communities that may seek reimbursement from inmates in county or city jails. A <a href="http://www.michiganvotes.org/2005-SB-208">2006 law</a> allowed this for communities in Kent, Macomb, Oakland, and Wayne Counties. The bill would expand this any community.
Passed in the Senate 36 to 0 (details)
To concur with the House-passed version of the bill.
